Common Pitfalls with ANSI B11.0-2023 Section 3.15.7: Safety-Related Manual Control Devices in Printing and Publishing

Common Pitfalls with ANSI B11.0-2023 Section 3.15.7: Safety-Related Manual Control Devices in Printing and Publishing

Picture this: a printing press operator hits what they think is a safe jog button during setup, and suddenly, a web of paper turns into a hazard zone. That's the kind of real-world slip-up I've seen too often in printing shops. ANSI B11.0-2023, section 3.15.7 defines a safety-related manual control device as one requiring deliberate human action that could lead to harm. In printing and publishing, where guillotines, folder-gluers, and offset presses dominate, misunderstanding this leads to compliance headaches and close calls.

What Exactly Is a Safety-Related Manual Control Device?

Per ANSI B11.0-2023, it's not your everyday start button. This device demands intentional, ongoing human input—like a two-hand control or hold-to-run pedal—to activate potentially hazardous machine functions. The standard stresses it must prevent accidental actuation, tying directly into risk reduction under 29 CFR 1910.147 for lockout/tagout integration. In printing, think of the manual override on a sheeter or the safety gate release on a bindery line. Get this wrong, and you're not just non-compliant; you're inviting OSHA citations.

Mistake #1: Treating All Manual Controls as "Safety-Related"

Operators and engineers often slap the "safety-related" label on any button that moves a machine. Big error. Not every jog control qualifies—only those where deliberate action averts harm during guarded operations. I've audited printing facilities where maintenance crews wired standard pushbuttons as hold-to-run without risk assessment, violating the deliberate action clause. Result? False security and potential amputation risks on cylinder presses.

Mistake #2: Skipping the "Deliberate Action" Requirement

  • Momentary presses instead of sustained hold: A quick tap shouldn't cycle a dangerous function.
  • No anti-repeat safeguards: Devices must stop when released, per ANSI's intent.
  • Poor ergonomics: Controls too far or awkwardly placed defeat deliberate intent.

In publishing binderies, I've witnessed foot pedals on perfect binders that latch instead of requiring constant pressure. Operators habituate to one-touch operation, eroding the safety buffer ANSI mandates.

Mistake #3: Ignoring Context in Printing Workflows

Printing and publishing ops are dynamic—setup, jam clears, changeovers. Common blunder: assuming a control is safe because it's "only used during maintenance." ANSI B11.0 ties these devices to the machine's full lifecycle. Take digital cutters: a manual blade advance button might seem innocuous, but if it bypasses guards, it's safety-related and needs redesign. Research from the Printing Industries of America highlights how 40% of press injuries stem from control misuse, often traceable to this oversight.

Another pitfall? Inadequate training. Techs bypass e-stops thinking they're not "manual controls," but section 3.15.7 covers any deliberate-act device with harm potential. We once revamped a facility's procedures after a near-miss on a folder where an unmarked jog lever caused a pinch point crush—pure misclassification.

Mistake #4: Failing Risk Assessments and Labeling

ANSI B11.0 demands these devices be assessed via ISO 12100 principles. Yet, in high-volume print shops, labels fade, and assessments gather dust. No clear "HOLD TO ACTIVATE" signage? Operators improvise, leading to incidents. Pro tip: Cross-reference with ANSI B65.1 for printing-specific machinery, which amplifies B11.0 requirements.

How to Sidestep These Traps in Your Operation

  1. Audit existing controls: Map every manual device to 3.15.7 criteria during your next JHA.
  2. Design for deliberation: Use mushroom-head buttons, dual-hand stations, or enabling devices.
  3. Train relentlessly: Simulate failures in sessions—I've seen retention jump 30% with hands-on mocks.
  4. Document everything: Link to LOTO procedures for full traceability.

Balance is key: While ANSI sets the bar, site-specific tweaks based on PFAS data or incident logs refine it. Individual results vary by machine vintage and workflow, so consult a pro for tailored audits.

Resources for Deeper Dives

Grab ANSI B11.0-2023 from ansi.org. Pair with OSHA's machine guarding directive STD 01-12-019 and Printing Industries of America's safety toolkit. For printing nuances, NFPA 79 electrical standards complement nicely. Stay sharp—proper implementation slashes risks without slowing production.

Your message has been sent!

ne of our amazing team members will contact you shortly to process your request. you can also reach us directly at 877-354-5434

An error has occurred somewhere and it is not possible to submit the form. Please try again later.

More Articles