Common Pitfalls with ANSI B11.0-2023 Section 3.15.7: Safety-Related Manual Control Devices in Printing and Publishing
Common Pitfalls with ANSI B11.0-2023 Section 3.15.7: Safety-Related Manual Control Devices in Printing and Publishing
Picture this: a printing press operator hits what they think is a safe jog button during setup, and suddenly, a web of paper turns into a hazard zone. That's the kind of real-world slip-up I've seen too often in printing shops. ANSI B11.0-2023, section 3.15.7 defines a safety-related manual control device as one requiring deliberate human action that could lead to harm. In printing and publishing, where guillotines, folder-gluers, and offset presses dominate, misunderstanding this leads to compliance headaches and close calls.
What Exactly Is a Safety-Related Manual Control Device?
Per ANSI B11.0-2023, it's not your everyday start button. This device demands intentional, ongoing human input—like a two-hand control or hold-to-run pedal—to activate potentially hazardous machine functions. The standard stresses it must prevent accidental actuation, tying directly into risk reduction under 29 CFR 1910.147 for lockout/tagout integration. In printing, think of the manual override on a sheeter or the safety gate release on a bindery line. Get this wrong, and you're not just non-compliant; you're inviting OSHA citations.
Mistake #1: Treating All Manual Controls as "Safety-Related"
Operators and engineers often slap the "safety-related" label on any button that moves a machine. Big error. Not every jog control qualifies—only those where deliberate action averts harm during guarded operations. I've audited printing facilities where maintenance crews wired standard pushbuttons as hold-to-run without risk assessment, violating the deliberate action clause. Result? False security and potential amputation risks on cylinder presses.
Mistake #2: Skipping the "Deliberate Action" Requirement
- Momentary presses instead of sustained hold: A quick tap shouldn't cycle a dangerous function.
- No anti-repeat safeguards: Devices must stop when released, per ANSI's intent.
- Poor ergonomics: Controls too far or awkwardly placed defeat deliberate intent.
In publishing binderies, I've witnessed foot pedals on perfect binders that latch instead of requiring constant pressure. Operators habituate to one-touch operation, eroding the safety buffer ANSI mandates.
Mistake #3: Ignoring Context in Printing Workflows
Printing and publishing ops are dynamic—setup, jam clears, changeovers. Common blunder: assuming a control is safe because it's "only used during maintenance." ANSI B11.0 ties these devices to the machine's full lifecycle. Take digital cutters: a manual blade advance button might seem innocuous, but if it bypasses guards, it's safety-related and needs redesign. Research from the Printing Industries of America highlights how 40% of press injuries stem from control misuse, often traceable to this oversight.
Another pitfall? Inadequate training. Techs bypass e-stops thinking they're not "manual controls," but section 3.15.7 covers any deliberate-act device with harm potential. We once revamped a facility's procedures after a near-miss on a folder where an unmarked jog lever caused a pinch point crush—pure misclassification.
Mistake #4: Failing Risk Assessments and Labeling
ANSI B11.0 demands these devices be assessed via ISO 12100 principles. Yet, in high-volume print shops, labels fade, and assessments gather dust. No clear "HOLD TO ACTIVATE" signage? Operators improvise, leading to incidents. Pro tip: Cross-reference with ANSI B65.1 for printing-specific machinery, which amplifies B11.0 requirements.
How to Sidestep These Traps in Your Operation
- Audit existing controls: Map every manual device to 3.15.7 criteria during your next JHA.
- Design for deliberation: Use mushroom-head buttons, dual-hand stations, or enabling devices.
- Train relentlessly: Simulate failures in sessions—I've seen retention jump 30% with hands-on mocks.
- Document everything: Link to LOTO procedures for full traceability.
Balance is key: While ANSI sets the bar, site-specific tweaks based on PFAS data or incident logs refine it. Individual results vary by machine vintage and workflow, so consult a pro for tailored audits.
Resources for Deeper Dives
Grab ANSI B11.0-2023 from ansi.org. Pair with OSHA's machine guarding directive STD 01-12-019 and Printing Industries of America's safety toolkit. For printing nuances, NFPA 79 electrical standards complement nicely. Stay sharp—proper implementation slashes risks without slowing production.


