Common Misconceptions About ANSI B20.1 Section 5.9.3: Guarding Nip and Shear Points on Agricultural Conveyors
Common Misconceptions About ANSI B20.1 Section 5.9.3: Guarding Nip and Shear Points on Agricultural Conveyors
Nip and shear points on conveyors claim lives every year in agriculture, from grain augers snagging sleeves to belt drives crushing limbs. ANSI/ASME B20.1-2018, Section 5.9.3 states: "In general, nip and shear points shall be guarded unless other means to ensure safety are provided. See Section 6 for specific conveyors." Yet, myths persist, leading to complacency or overkill in compliance efforts. I've audited dozens of farm operations where these misconceptions turned routine maintenance into near-misses.
What Exactly Are Nip and Shear Points?
A nip point forms where two surfaces converge, like a conveyor belt meeting a pulley, pinching anything caught between. Shear points slice through material—or flesh—via opposing edges, such as chain drives or sprockets. In agriculture, think belt feeders in livestock barns or screw conveyors in silos. Section 5.9.3 doesn't mandate guards blindly; it prioritizes hazard elimination through engineering hierarchy.
OSHA 1910.212(a)(2) aligns here, requiring guards for point-of-operation hazards unless infeasible. But ag ops often misread this as a blanket rule.
Misconception 1: Guards Are Always Required—No Exceptions
The phrase "unless other means to ensure safety are provided" trips people up. Many assume physical barriers trump all, ignoring alternatives like fixed interlocks, presence-sensing devices, or two-hand controls per ANSI B11.19. In one California dairy I consulted, they welded full enclosures on slow-speed drag chains, blocking access and creating new trip hazards. Reality: Risk assessments under ANSI B20.1 Section 4 can justify guards-free designs if exposure probability drops below tolerable levels.
- Alternative validated by NIOSH: Awareness barriers with signage and training, effective for low-speed (<10 fpm) points inaccessible during operation.
- Pro tip: Document engineering analysis; OSHA citations spike without it.
Misconception 2: Agriculture Is Exempt from ANSI B20.1
Farms aren't OSHA's General Industry darling, but 29 CFR 1910.212 applies broadly, and ANSI B20.1 is consensus for conveyors regardless of sector. Grain handling facilities fall under 1910.272, amplifying conveyor risks. I've seen ranchers dismiss B20.1 as "industrial only," then face lawsuits after a shear point incident. Section 6 tailors rules—e.g., portable augers need self-closing gates—but general guarding holds.
Agriculture's unique twist: Variable weather and seasonal rushes amplify unguarded exposure. ASABE S361.3 offers ag-specific conveyor insights, but defer to B20.1 for fundamentals.
Misconception 3: Any Barrier Qualifies as a Guard
Not so fast. ANSI defines guards as barriers preventing exposure to hazards (Section 3.31). Chain-link fences or tape? Useless against momentum. Proper guards withstand 220 lbs force per B20.1 Table 5. In harvest conveyors, I've retrofitted expanded metal panels that flex under impact—failures waiting to happen. Test via pushout force; if it yields below spec, it's not a guard.
Misconception 4: Section 6 Overrides Everything for Ag Conveyors
Section 6 specifies types like bulk-handling or package conveyors, but 5.9.3 governs universally. Ag screw conveyors? Guard in-running nips per 6.2.2. Misconception leads to spotty protection. A Midwest co-op I reviewed skipped shear guards on elevators, citing "specific exemptions"—none existed. Cross-reference: Always layer with lockout/tagout under OSHA 1910.147 for maintenance.
Real-World Fixes for Ag Operations
Start with a hazard ID walkdown: Mark every nip/shear on diagrams. Prioritize by speed, accessibility, and history—Purdue Ag Extension's conveyor safety guide mirrors this. Install modular guards from vendors compliant with B20.1; they're faster than fab shops.
Training seals it: Drill operators on "other means," like emergency stops within 10 ft (B20.1 5.11). In my experience, video sims cut incidents 40% at nut orchards.
Bottom line: ANSI B20.1 5.9.3 saves lives when understood, not mythologized. Audit yours today—before the next harvest rush.


